198 202 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

June 9, 2013, 1:45 am

≫ Next: OAI 2.0 Request Results

≪ Previous: Bibliorandum: Akademya

$

0

0

198 202

Keywords:h-index; Scopus; Google Scholar; Web of Science; Nobel Prize; Physics; Chemistry; Economic Sciences.
Collection:opensource

Description

H. Farhadi, H. Salehi, M. M. Yunus, A. Aghaei Chadegani, M. Farhadi, M. Fooladi, and N. Ale Ebrahim, “Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the h-index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers?,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 198-202, March, 2013.

Be the first to write a review
Downloaded 1 times Reviews

Selected metadata

Identifier:	198202
Mediatype:	texts
Scanner:	Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.4
Identifier-access:	http://archive.org/details/198202
Identifier-ark:	ark:/13960/t0ms5b97r
Ppi:	300
Ocr:	ABBYY FineReader 8.0

198 202 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

---

OAI 2.0 Request Results

June 9, 2013, 1:45 am

≫ Next: Latest Additions to E-LIS repository - E-LIS repository

≪ Previous: 198 202 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

$

0

0

Dublin Core Metadata (oai_dc)

Title	Does it matter which citation tool is used to compare the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers?
Author or Creator	Farhadi, Hadi
Author or Creator	Salehi, Hadi
Author or Creator	Yunus, Melor Md
Author or Creator	Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo
Author or Creator	Farhadi, Maryam
Author or Creator	Fooladi, Masood
Author or Creator	Ale Ebrahim, Nader
Subject and Keywords	BA. Use and impact of information.
Subject and Keywords	BB. Bibliometric methods.
Subject and Keywords	E. Publishing and legal issues.
Subject and Keywords	IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
Description	h-index retrieved by citation indexes (Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science) is used to measure the scientific performance and the research impact studies based on the number of publications and citations of a scientist. It also is easily available and may be used for performance measures of scientists, and for recruitment decisions. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference between the outputs and results from these three citation databases namely Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science based upon the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers (Nobel Prize winner scientist). The purposive sampling method was adopted to collect the required data. The results showed that there is a significant difference in the h-index between three citation indexes of Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science; the Google scholar h-index was more than the h-index in two other databases. It was also concluded that there is a significant positive relationship between h-indices based on Google scholar and Scopus. The citation indexes of Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science may be useful for evaluating h-index of scientists but they have some limitations as well.
Publisher	AENSI Publications
Date	2013-03-27
Resource Type	Journal Article (Print/Paginated)
Resource Type	PeerReviewed
Format	text
Resource Identifier	http://eprints.rclis.org/19367/1/198-202.pdf
Resource Identifier	Farhadi, Hadi and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Farhadi, Maryam and Fooladi, Masood and Ale Ebrahim, Nader Does it matter which citation tool is used to compare the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers? Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013, vol. 7, n. 4, pp. 198-202. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]
Relation	http://eprints.rclis.org/19367/

OAI 2.0 Request Results

Latest Additions to E-LIS repository - E-LIS repository

June 9, 2013, 1:47 am

≫ Next: Item matches "Nader Ale Ebrahim" - E-LIS repository

≪ Previous: OAI 2.0 Request Results

$

0

0

López, Fernando-ArielAcceso abierto en las Ciencias Sociales de América Latina y Caribe: el caso CLACSO., 2013 . In II Congreso Internacional de Cultura Libre, Quito (Ecuador), 30-31 de Mayo. (Unpublished) [Presentation]

López, Fernando-ArielDifusión de las Ciencias Sociales de América Latina y El Caribe en Acceso Abierto: el caso CLACSO., 2013 . In 58th Annual SALALM Conference, Miami (Estados Unidos), 17-22 de Mayo. (Unpublished) [Presentation]

Rodríguez-Yunta, LuisPensando en digital: uso del doi en revistas españolas, una asignatura aún pendiente.Anuario ThinkEPI, 2013, vol. 7, pp. 164-168. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Rodríguez-Yunta, LuisHumanidades digitales, ¿una mera etiqueta o un campo por el que deben apostar las ciencias de la documentación?Anuario ThinkEPI, 2013, vol. 7, pp. 37-43. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Farhadi, Hadi and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Farhadi, Maryam and Fooladi, Masood and Ale Ebrahim, NaderDoes it matter which citation tool is used to compare the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers?Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013, vol. 7, n. 4, pp. 198-202. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Utulu, Samuel C. Avemaria and Akadri, Adebayo AliuInstitutional Repositories: The Untapped Academic Goldmine., 2010 . In Second Professional Summit on Information Science and Technology, Nsukka (Nigeria), 3-7 May 2010. [Conference Paper]

Shaw, Amit Kumar, AmitCloud Computing for Libraries:An Economic Strategy., 2013 . In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACADEMIC LIBRARIES, India, 12th - 15th Feburary. [Conference Paper]

Latest Additions to E-LIS repository - E-LIS repository

Item matches "Nader Ale Ebrahim" - E-LIS repository

June 9, 2013, 1:47 am

≫ Next: Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process - Repository of the Academy's Library

≪ Previous: Latest Additions to E-LIS repository - E-LIS repository

$

0

0

1.	Fooladi, Masood and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi, Maryam and Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Farhadi, Hadi and Ale Ebrahim, NaderDoes criticisms overcome the praises of journal impact factor?Asian Social Science , 2013, vol. 9, n. 5, pp. 176-182. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]
2.	Farhadi, Hadi and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Farhadi, Maryam and Fooladi, Masood and Ale Ebrahim, NaderDoes it matter which citation tool is used to compare the h-index of a group of highly cited researchers?Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2013, vol. 7, n. 4, pp. 198-202. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]
3.	Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi, Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim, NaderA comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases.Asian Social Science , 2013, vol. 9, n. 5, pp. 18-26. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Displaying results 1 to 3 of 3.
Refine search | New search
Item matches "Nader Ale Ebrahim" - E-LIS repository

Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process - Repository of the Academy's Library

June 11, 2013, 4:47 am

≫ Next: A conceptual model of virtual product development process

≪ Previous: Item matches "Nader Ale Ebrahim" - E-LIS repository

$

0

0

Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process

Ale Ebrahim, Nader and Ahmed, Shamsuddin and Taha, Zahari (2009) Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process. African Journal of Marketing Management, 1 (9). pp. 211-219. ISSN 1993-8233

Text Nader Modified stage-gate in AJMM.pdf Download (494Kb) | Preview

Official URL: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMM/Content/2009c...

Abstract

In today’s dynamic marketplace, manufacturing companies are under strong pressure to introduce new products for long-term survival with their competitors. Nevertheless, every company cannot cope up progressively or immediately with the market requirements due to knowledge dynamics being experienced in the competitive milieu. Increased competition and reduced product life cycles put force upon companies to develop new products faster. In response to these pressing needs, there should be some new approach compatible in flexible circumstances. This paper presents a solution based on the popular Stage-Gate system, which is closely linked with virtual team approach. Virtual teams can provide a platform to advance the knowledge-base in a company and thus to reduce time-to-market. This article introduces conceptual product development architecture under a virtual team umbrella. The paper describes all the major aspects of new product development (NPD), NPD process and its relationship with virtual teams, Stage-Gate system finally presents a modified Stage-Gate system to cope up with the changing needs. It also provides the guidelines for the successful implementation of virtual teams in new product development.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Modified stage-gate system, virtual product development, conceptual model
Subjects:	A General Works / általános művek > AC Collections. Series. Collected works / gyűjteményes munkák, sorozatok H Social Sciences / társadalomtudományok > H Social Sciences (General) / társadalomtudomány általában L Education / oktatás > L1 Education (General) / oktatás általában Q Science / természettudomány > Q1 Science (General) / természettudomány általában T Technology / alkalmazott, műszaki tudományok > T2 Technology (General) / műszaki tudományok általában T Technology / alkalmazott, műszaki tudományok > TS Manufactures / különféle iparágak, ipari termékek
Depositing User:	Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	30 May 2013 11:23
Last Modified:	30 May 2013 11:23
URI:	http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/5377

Actions (login required)

View Item

Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process - Repository of the Academy's Library

A conceptual model of virtual product development process

June 11, 2013, 4:48 am

≫ Next: EconBiz Search Results

≪ Previous: Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process - Repository of the Academy's Library

$

0

0

A conceptual model of virtual product development process

Alternative title:	A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process
Year:	2009-04-30
Abstract:	In today’s dynamic marketplace, companies are under strong pressure to introduce new products for long-term survival with their competitors. Besides, every company cannot cope up progressively or immediately with the market requirements due to knowledge ... [more]
Person:	Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari
Institution:	Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
Series:	MPRA PaperMPRA Paper
Subject:	Modified Stage-Gate System; Virtual Product Development; Conceptual Model
Classification:	jel-M12; jel-O32; jel-L17; jel-L1; jel-L2; jel-M11; jel-M1; jel-O3; jel-P4; jel-L15
Type of publication:	Buch / Working Paper
Title record from database:	RePEc - Research Papers in Economics

Availability:

A conceptual model of virtual product development process

EconBiz Search Results

June 11, 2013, 4:49 am

≫ Next: Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams by Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha :: SSRN

≪ Previous: A conceptual model of virtual product development process

$

0

0

	1	Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams
		Year:                      2011 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Hanim, Salwa; Hanim, Salwa; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	2	The effectiveness of virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: experiences of Malaysian SMEs
		Year:                      2011-04-07 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Rashid, Abdul; Hanim, Salwa; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	3	Virtual Teams: A New Opportunity to Develop a Business
		Year:                      2010 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Rashid, Abdul; Hanim, Salwa; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	4	Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs
		Year:                      2010-07-01 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	5	Critical factors for new product developments in SMEs virtual team
		Year:                      2010 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	6	SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review
		Year:                      2010-05-20 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	7	Virtual R&D Teams: A potential growth of education-industry collaboration
		Year:                      2010-06 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Rashid, Abdul; Hanim, Salwa; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	8	The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs
		Year:                      2010-06 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Rashid, Abdul; Hanim, Salwa; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	9	Virtual Collaborative R&D Teams in Malaysia Manufacturing SMEs
		Year:                      2010-11-11 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Rashid, Abdul; Hanim, Salwa; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text

	10	Innovation and R&D Activities in Virtual Team
		Year:                      2009-07-06 Person:  Ale Ebrahim, Nader; Ahmed, Shamsuddin; Taha, Zahari Institution:  Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Availability:  Full text More options

EconBiz Search Results:  creator:"Ale Ebrahim, Nader"

Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams by Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha :: SSRN

June 11, 2013, 4:53 am

≫ Next: [1305.0377] A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

≪ Previous: EconBiz Search Results

$

0

0

Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams

Nader Ale Ebrahim

University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering

Shamsuddin Ahmed

University of Malaya (UM)

Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid

University of Malaya (UM) - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture

Zahari Taha

University Malaysia Pahang - Department of Manufacturing Engineering

February 4, 2012

American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9-14, 2012

Abstract:     
Problem statement: Although, literature proves the importance of the technology role in the effectiveness of virtual Research and Development (R&D) teams for new product development. However, the factors that make technology construct in a virtual R&D team are still ambiguous. The manager of virtual R&D teams for new product development does not know which type of technology should be used. Approach: To address the gap and answer the question, the study presents a set of factors that make a technology construct. The proposed construct modified by finding of the field survey (N = 240). We empirically examine the relationship between construct and its factors by employing the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A measurement model built base on the 19 preliminary factors that extracted from literature review. The result shows 10 factors out of 19 factors maintaining to make technology construct. Results: These 10 technology factors can be grouped into two constructs namely Web base communication and Web base data sharing. The findings can help new product development managers of enterprises to concentrate in the main factors for leading an effective virtual R&D team. In addition, it provides a guideline for software developers as well. Conclusion: The second and third generation technologies are now more suitable for developing new products through virtual R&D teams.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Collaboration teams, questionnaires performance, cross-functional teams, product development, structural equation modeling, measurement model, literature review
JEL Classification: L1,L11,L7, M11, M12, M1, M54, Q1, O1, O32, P42, P29, L17, Q31, Q32

Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams by Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha :: SSRN

---

[1305.0377] A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

June 11, 2013, 5:31 pm

≫ Next: dblp: Nader Ale Ebrahim

≪ Previous: Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams by Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha :: SSRN

$

0

0

arXiv.org> cs> arXiv:1305.0377

Search or Article-id

(Help | Advanced search)

 

Download:

• PDF only

Current browse context:

cs.DL

< prev | next >

new | recent | 1305

Change to browse by:

cs
cs.CY

References & Citations

• NASA ADS

Bookmark

(what is this?)

Computer Science > Digital Libraries

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Hadi Farhadi, Masood Fooladi, Maryam Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim

(Submitted on 2 May 2013)

Nowadays, the worlds scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.

Comments:	9 pages, 4 figures
Subjects:	Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
MSC classes:	K.3.2
Journal reference:	Asian Social Science vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013
DOI:	10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Cite as:	arXiv:1305.0377 [cs.DL]
	(or arXiv:1305.0377v1 [cs.DL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Nader Ale Ebrahim [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 May 2013 09:21:26 GMT (321kb)

Which authors of this paper are endorsers?

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.

[1305.0377] A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

dblp: Nader Ale Ebrahim

June 11, 2013, 5:33 pm

≫ Next: Nader Ale Ebrahim - Publications List

≪ Previous: [1305.0377] A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

$

0

0

• 2013
• [i7]
  Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md. Yunus, Hadi Farhadi, Masood Fooladi, Maryam Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim: A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases.CoRR abs/1305.0377 (2013)
• [i6]
  Masood Fooladi, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md. Yunus, Maryam Farhadi, Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim: Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?CoRR abs/1305.0379 (2013)
• 2012
• [i5]
  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha: Technology Use in the Virtual R&amp;D Teams.CoRR abs/1207.6830 (2012)
• [i4]
  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha: The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs.CoRR abs/1207.6832 (2012)
• [i3]
  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha: Establishing Virtual R&amp;D Teams: Obliged Policy.CoRR abs/1208.0944 (2012)
• [i2]
  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha: Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process.CoRR abs/1210.7482 (2012)
• [i1]
  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha, M. A. Wazed: Virtual Collaborative R&amp;D Teams in Malaysia Manufacturing SMEs.CoRR abs/1210.7889 (2012)

dblp: Nader Ale Ebrahim

Nader Ale Ebrahim - Publications List

June 11, 2013, 5:34 pm

≫ Next: Twitter / PeerEvaluation: A Comparison between Two Main ...

≪ Previous: dblp: Nader Ale Ebrahim

$

0

0

Journal articles
2013	Hadi Farhadi, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Maryam Farhadi, Masood Fooladi, Nader Ale Ebrahim (2013) DoesitMatterWhichCitationToolisUsedtoComparetheh-indexofaGroupofHighlyCitedResearchers? Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7: 4. 198-202
	DOI  Masood Fooladi, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Maryam Farhadi, Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim (2013) DoesCriticismOvercomethePraisesofJournalImpactFactor? Asian Social Science 9: 5. 176-182
	DOI  Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Hadi Farhadi, Masood Fooladi, Maryam Farhadi, Nader Ale Ebrahim (2013) AComparisonbetweenTwoMainAcademicLiteratureCollections:WebofScienceandScopusDatabases Asian Social Science 9: 5. 18-26
2012	DOI  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha, M A Wazed (2012) VirtualCollaborativeR&DTeamsinMalaysiaManufacturingSMEs Advanced Materials Research 433-440: 1653-1659
	DOI  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2012) TechnologyUseintheVirtualR&DTeams American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 5: 1. 9-14 01
	DOI  Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2012) EffectiveVirtualTeamsforNewProductDevelopment Scientific Research and Essay 7: 21. 1971-1985
	DOI  M A Wazed, S Ahmed, Y Nukman, Nader Ale Ebrahim (2012) ModelsforComponentCommonalityinMultistageProduction Applied Mechanics and Materials 110-116: 258-266 10
2011	Ale Ebrahim, Nader Shamsuddin Ahmed Zahari Taha (2011) VirtualTeamsandManagementChallenges Academic Leadership Journal 9: 3. 1-7
	Ale Ebrahim, Nader Shamsuddin Ahmed Zahari Taha (2011) VirtualR&DTeams:Apotentialgrowthofeducation-industrycollaboration Academic Leadership Journal 9: 4. 1-5
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2011) TheEffectivenessofVirtualR&DTeamsinSMEs:ExperiencesofMalaysianSMEs Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 10: 2. 109-114 06
2010	M R R R Raval, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) WORKTOGETHER…WHENAPARTCHALLENGESANDWHATISNEEDFOREFFECTIVEVIRTUALTEAMS Journal of Information, Knowledge and Research in Business Management and Administration 1: 1. 1-3 October
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) VirtualR&DTeamsandSMEsGrowth:AComparativeStudybetweenIranianandMalaysianSMEs African Journal of Business Management 4: 11. 2368-2379 September
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) SMEs;Virtualresearchanddevelopment(R&D)teamsandnewproductdevelopment:Aliteraturereview International Journal of the Physical Sciences 5: 7. 916–930 07
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) CriticalFactorsforNewProductDevelopmentsinSMEsVirtualTeam African Journal of Business Management 4: 11. 2247-2257 September
2009	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) ModifiedStage-Gate:AConceptualModelofVirtualProductDevelopmentProcess African Journal of Marketing Management 1: 9. 211-219 12
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) InnovationandR&DActivitiesinVirtualTeam European Journal of Scientific Research 34: 3. 297-307
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualR&Dteamsinsmallandmediumenterprises:Aliteraturereview Scientific Research and Essay 4: 13. 1575–1590 12
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualTeams:aLiteratureReview Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3: 3. 2653-2669
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualTeamsforNewProductDevelopment:AnInnovativeExperienceforR&DEngineers European Journal of Educational Studies 1: 3. 109-123 10
Conference papers
2011	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2011) ManagingCommunicationinNewProductDevelopmentProcess:VirtualR&DTeamsandInformationTechnology In: United Kingdom - Malaysia - Ireland Engineering Science Conference 2011 (UMIES 2011) 495-502 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press
	Nader Ale Ebrahim Shamsuddin Ahmed Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid Zahari Taha M A Wazed (2011) VirtualCollaborativeR&DTeamsinMalaysiaManufacturingSMEs In: 2nd International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2011) Edited by:Steve Thatcher, Venkatesh. V2-114 - V2-117 Hotel Royal, Singapore:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2011) KnowledgeWorkerRoleintheVirtualR&DTeamsforNewProductDevelopment:AMeasurementModel In: International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Renewable Energy 2011 (ICMERE2011) 1-5 Chittagong, Bangladesh: Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology
2010	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) BenefitsandPitfallsofVirtualR&DTeams:AnEmpiricalStudy In: 6th International Communication & Information Technology Management Conference (ICTM 2010) 1-5 Tehran, Iran:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2010) EnvisagesofNewProductDevelopmentsinSmallandMediumEnterprisesthroughVirtualTeam In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM2010) 1-10 Dhaka, Bangladesh:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2010) TheEffectivenessofVirtualR&DTeamsinSMEs:ExperiencesofMalaysianSMEs In: The 11th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference (APIEMS 2010), 7 – 10 December 2010, Melaka, Malaysia. 1-6 APIEMS Melaka, Malaysia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid, Zahari Taha (2010) VirtualTeams:ANewOpportunitytoDevelopaBusiness In: International Conference on Entrepreneurship Across Boundaries 1-5 Section For Co-curricular Courses, External Faculty Electives and TITAS, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
	Nader Ale Ebrahim Shamsuddin Ahmed Salwa Hanim Abdul Rashid Zahari Taha (2010) TheEffectivenessofVirtualR&DTeamsinSMEs:ExperiencesofMalaysianSMEs In: The 11th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference 2010 (APIEMS 2010) Melaka, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press
2009	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha, Fatimah Ibrahim, Cheen-Onn Chow, Saad Mekhilef (2009) SMEsandVirtualR&DTeams:AMotiveChannelforRelationshipbetweenSMEs In: The International Conference for Technical Postgraduates (TECHPOS 2009) Edited by:IBRAHIM, F., CHOW, C.-O. & MEKHILEF, S.. 1-7 The Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) SMEs:ERPorVirtualCollaborationTeams In: First Enterprise Resource Planning conference 1-12 Tehran, Iran.:
	Mohammad Ali Shafia, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) Considerationofthevirtualteamworkanddisabledcitizens,aspromisingopportunityprovidersfortheegovernmentinfrastructure'sformation In: The Second Conference on Electronic City (e-city 2009) 959-966 Tehran, Iran:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) AConceptualModelofVirtualProductDevelopmentProcess In: 2nd Seminar on Engineering and Information Technology, (SEIT 2009) 191-196 Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Mohammad Ali Shafia, Hamid Tahbaz Tavakoli (2009) VirtualR&Dteam:TechnologyTransferFacilitator In: IAMOT 2009 -The 18th International Conference on Management of Technology 1-10 Orlando, Florida, USA:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualTeamsandManagementChallenges In: 1st Executive MBA Conference Tehran, Iran:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha, Tan Bee Hoon, Shameem Rafik Galea (2009) Virtuality,innovationandR&Dactivities In: 14th International Conference on Thinking (2009 Malaysia) -Theme "Thinking Minds: Nurturing the Design of a Better Future" Edited by:HOON, T. B. & GALEA, S. R.. 515-529 Universiti Putra Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
	Mohammad Ali Shafia, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) INNOVATIONPROCESSISFACILITATEDINVIRTUALENVIRONMENTOFR&DTEAMS In: International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN09) 2157-2166 Barcelona, Spain:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualR&DTeams:InnovationandTechnologyFacilitator In: Engineering Education in 2025 1-14 School of Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2009) VirtualTeamsforNPD–anInnovativeExperienceforR&DEngineers In: International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering 1036-1045 UiTM Concorde Hotel, Shah Alam, Malaysia: University Publication Centre (UPENA), UiTM 2009
2008	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) Literature,PrincipleandthebasicsofNetworkValueCreationinR&D:Therelationshipwitheconomy In: Seventh conference of Industries and Mines R&D Centers- R&D and Network Value Creation IRIB Int'l. Conference Center, Tehran, Iran.:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) ConcurrentCollaborationinResearchandDevelopment In: National Conference on Design and Concurrent Engineering (DECON) 2008 1-4 Melaka, Malaysia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) DealingwithVirtualR&DTeamsinNewProductDevelopment In: The 9th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference and the 11th Asia Pacific Regional Meeting of the International Foundation for Production Research 795-806 Department of Industrial Engineering Institut Teknologi Bandung Nusa Dua, Bali - Indonesia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha, Ricard Li-Hua, Charles Egbu, Zhongxiu Zhao, Lucy Lu, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Salford (2008) NewProductDevelopmentinVirtualEnvironment In: International Conference on Technology Management and Innovation in China: Challenges and Opportunities in the 21st Century 203-218 CAMOT and MOTSC UIBE, Beijing, China:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) R&DNetworkingandvalueCreationinSMEsR&DNetworkingandvalueCreationinSMEs In: Seventh conference of Industries and Mines R&D Centers- R&D and Network Value Creation 1-6 IRIB Int'l. Conference Center, Tehran, Iran.:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) VirtualR&DTeams:aSustainableInfrastructureforPromotingSMEs In: 2nd Engineering Conference (EnCon 2008) 217-223 Crowne Plaza Riverside Hotel, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) VirtualEnvironmentsInnovationandR&DActivities:ManagementChallenges In: Proceedings of the International Graduate on Engineering and Science (IGCES'08) 116-124 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Johor Bahru, Malaysia:
	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha (2008) VirtualR&DTeamsforNPDinSMEs:Past,PresentandFutureTrend In: APCMOTTE2008 (Asia pacific Conference on Management of Technology and Technology Entrepreneurship) 1-10 Melaka ,Malaysia:
2005	Nader Ale Ebrahim, Maziar Rostamnezhad, Ali Momeni (2005) ProductionAndPerformanceOfHeavyDutyCNG In: ANGVA 2005, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1-13 ANGVA ANGVA 2005, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia:
1996	H Shokouhmand, Nader Ale Ebrahim, B D Czejdo, I I Esat, B Trousse, B Shirazi (1996) Heattransferfromhumidairtoatwo-rowdirectexpansionplatefinnedtubecoils(DX)undercondensingconditions In: Proceedings of the 1996 3rd Biennial Joint Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA. Part 7 (of 9) 221-228 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Montpellier, France: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) PD
Presentation
2011	Nader Ale Ebrahim (2011) HowtoConductaLiteratureReview [Presentation]
	Nader Ale Ebrahim (2011) Howtoincreaseh-index“Advertiseanddisseminatepublications” [Presentation]
Other

All Tags: Air conditioning,   Business development,   Chemistry,   citation tracking,   citations,   Collaboration (7),   collaboration,   Collaboration teams,   Collaborative tools (2),   communication,   component commonality,   conceptual model (2),   Conceptual model (2),   Conceptual Model,   Concurrent Collaboration (2),   Condensation,   coverage,   Criticism,   Cross-Functional teams (2),   cross-functional teams (2),   database,   developing countries.,   Development,   Direct expansion plate finned tube coils,   Disabled Citizen,   E Government,   e-learning,   Economic Sciences.,   Education,   Effective virtual team,   Electric coils,   Entrepreneurship,   ERP,   Factor Analysis,   factor analysis,   Finite difference method,   Fins (heat exchange),   Google Scholar,   h-index (2),   Heat analysis,   Heat transfer,   ICT application (2),   Idea creation,   impact factor,   Impact factor (IF),   indexing,   information,   Innovation (2),   integration,   Journal ranking,   Literature review (2),   literature review (2),   Literature Review (2),   Management Challenge (2),   Mass transfer,   Mathematical models,   MATHEMATICAL models,   measurement model,   Measurement model.,   Modified stage-gate system (2),   Modified Stage-Gate System,   Network,   New Product Development (4),   new product development (2),   New product Development,   New product development (2),   Nobel Prize,   NPD,   Performance,   performance (2),   Physics,   Praise,   Product development (2),   product development,   product development.,   Production And Performance Of Heavy Duty CNG,   provenance,   Questionnaires (4),   questionnaires (2),   R&D (3),   R&D Engineers (2),   R&D.,   Research and Development (2),   Research and development, Learning,   Research and Developments,   researcher ID,   researcher profile,   Review paper,   Reynolds number,   Scopus,   SCOPUS,   scopus,   searching,   Self-citation,   small and medium enterprises (3),   Small and Medium Enterprises,   Small and medium enterprises (3),   Small and medium Enterprises,   Small and medium Enterprises.,   Small and Medium Enterprises.,   Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs),   SMEs (3),   Structural equation modeling (2),   structural equation modeling,   success,   Survey,   survey,   Survey Finding (2),   Survey finding (3),   Survey findings,   Team,   Technology,   Technology management,   Technology Transfer,   Temperature distribution,   Value creation,   Virtual Experience (2),   Virtual Product,   virtual product development (2),   Virtual R&D team (3),   Virtual R&D team; Innovation,   Virtual R&D Teams (2),   Virtual R&D teams (3),   Virtual team (4),   Virtual Team (6),   virtual team.,   Virtual teams (11),   virtual teams (2),   Virtual Teams,   Virtual teams. (2),   Virtual Workplaces,   Web of Science,   Web of science,   web of science,   Workplace

Authors

S Ahmed (37),   A Chadegani (3),   C Chow,   B Czejdo,   A Ebrahim (2),   N Ebrahim (45),   C Egbu,   I Esat,   H Farhadi (3),   M Farhadi (3),   M Fooladi (3),   S Galea,   T Hoon,   F Ibrahim,   R Li-Hua,   L Lu,   S Mekhilef,   A Momeni,   Y Nukman,   S Rashid (8),   M Raval,   M Rostamnezhad,   H Salehi (3),   U of Salford,   C School,   M Shafia (3),   B Shirazi,   H Shokouhmand,   N Taha (3),   Z Taha (36),   H Tavakoli,   B Trousse,   M Wazed (2),   N Wazed,   M Yunus (3),   Z Zhao

Nader Ale Ebrahim - Publications List

Twitter / PeerEvaluation: A Comparison between Two Main ...

June 11, 2013, 5:35 pm

≫ Next: A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

≪ Previous: Nader Ale Ebrahim - Publications List

$

0

0

PeerEvaluation.org‏@PeerEvaluation

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases http://shar.es/Z23ZF  via @aleebrahim

• Reply
• Retweet
• Favorite

Twitter / PeerEvaluation: A Comparison between Two Main ...

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

June 11, 2013, 5:35 pm

≫ Next: A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases - E-LIS repository

≪ Previous: Twitter / PeerEvaluation: A Comparison between Two Main ...

$

0

0

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases

Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Md Yunus, Melor and Farhadi, Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim, Nader (2013): A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Published in: Asian Social Science , Vol. 9, No. 5 (27. April 2013): pp. 18-26.

PDF MPRA_paper_46898.pdf Download (672Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.

Item Type:	MPRA Paper
Original Title:	A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
English Title:	A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
Language:	English
Keywords:	web of science, scopus, database, citations, provenance, coverage, searching, citation tracking, impact factor, indexing, h-index, researcher profile, researcher ID
Subjects:	I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I23 - Higher Education Research Institutions O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy
Item ID:	46898
Depositing User:	Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	11. May 2013 07:46
Last Modified:	11. May 2013 07:57
References:	Abrizah, A., Zainab, A., Kiran, K., & Raj, R. (2012). LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics. Bakkalbassi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(7). Retrieved from http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? – A comparison of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. Bar-Ilan, J. Levene, M., & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 26-34. Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigen factor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314-316. Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2006). Scopus: The product and its development. The Serials Librarian, 49(3), 147-153. Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1). Chou, P. N. (2012). A Comparison Study of Impact Factor in Web of Science and Scopus Databases for Engineering Education and Educational Technology Journals. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 187-194. Deis, L., & Goodman, D. (2005). Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus. The Charleston Advisor, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.charlestonco.com/comp.cfm?id=43 Dess, H. M. (2006). Database reviews and reports: Scopus. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 45 (Winter). Retrieved from http://www.istl.org Egghe, L. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: the g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9. Escalona Fernández, M. I., Lagar Barbosa, P., & Pulgarín Guerrero, A. (2010). Web of Science Vs. Scopus: un estudio cuantitativo en ingeniería química. Anales de Documentación, 13, 159-175. Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628. Fingerman, S. (2006). Web of Science and Scopus: Current features and capabilities. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 48(Fall). Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/06-fall/electronic2.html Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93. Gary, E., & Hodkinson, S. Z. (2008). Comparison of journal citation reports and Scopus impact factors for ecology and environmental sciences journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 54. Glanzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457-473. Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351-362. Haddow, G., & Genoni, P. (2010). Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals. Scientometrics, 85(2), 471-487. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537-1547. Kulkarni, A. V. Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citation in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA, 302, 1092-1096.
URI:	http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46898

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases - E-LIS repository

June 11, 2013, 5:36 pm

≫ Next: SSRN Author Page for Salehi, Hadi

≪ Previous: A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases - Munich Personal RePEc Archive

$

0

0

A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases

Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi, Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim, Nader A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science , 2013, vol. 9, n. 5, pp. 18-26. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Text 26960-90396-1-SM.pdf Download (321Kb) | Preview

English abstract

Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.

Item type:	Journal Article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords:	Web of Science, Scopus, Database, Citations, Provenance, Coverage, Searching, Citation tracking, Impact factor, Indexing, H-index, Researcher profile, Researcher ID
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information. C. Users, literacy and reading. E. Publishing and legal issues. K. Housing technologies. L. Information technology and library technology.
Depositing user:	Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date deposited:	14 May 2013 20:26
Last modified:	14 May 2013 20:26
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/19207

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Abrizah, A., Zainab, A., Kiran, K., & Raj, R. (2012). LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: a comparison between Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics.

Bakkalbassi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(7). Retrieved from http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7.

Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? – A comparison of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.

Bar-Ilan, J. Levene, M., & Lin, A. (2007). Some measures for comparing citation databases. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 26-34.

Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005). An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html

Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigen factor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314-316.

Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2006). Scopus: The product and its development. The Serials Librarian, 49(3), 147-153.

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1).

Chou, P. N. (2012). A Comparison Study of Impact Factor in Web of Science and Scopus Databases for Engineering Education and Educational Technology Journals. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 187-194.

Deis, L., & Goodman, D. (2005). Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus. The Charleston Advisor, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.charlestonco.com/comp.cfm?id=43

Dess, H. M. (2006). Database reviews and reports: Scopus. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 45 (Winter). Retrieved from http://www.istl.org

Egghe, L. (2006). An improvement of the h-index: the g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9.

Escalona Fernández, M. I., Lagar Barbosa, P., & Pulgarín Guerrero, A. (2010). Web of Science Vs. Scopus: un estudio cuantitativo en ingeniería química. Anales de Documentación, 13, 159-175.

Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628.

Fingerman, S. (2006). Web of Science and Scopus: Current features and capabilities. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 48(Fall). Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/06-fall/electronic2.html

Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93.

Gary, E., & Hodkinson, S. Z. (2008). Comparison of journal citation reports and Scopus impact factors for ecology and environmental sciences journals. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 54.

Glanzel, W., Schlemmer, B., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006). Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 68(3), 457-473.

Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351-362.

Haddow, G., & Genoni, P. (2010). Citation analysis and peer ranking of Australian social science journals. Scientometrics, 85(2), 471-487.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.

Jacso, P. (2005). As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537-1547.

Kulkarni, A. V. Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citation in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA, 302, 1092-1096.

Laguardia, C. (2005). E-views and reviews: Scopus vs. Web of Science. Library Journal, 15.

Levine-Clark, M., & Gil, E. L. (2009). A comparative citation analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 14(1), 32-46.

Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010). Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, SciFinder, and Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(3), 196-217.

Lopez-Illescas, C., Moya-Anegon, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304-316.

Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008). Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1711-1726.

Meho, L. I., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2009). Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: A tale of two citation databases — Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2499-2508.

Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265-277.

Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 193-210.

Pislyakov, V. (2009). Comparing two thermometers: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals ac-cording to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus. Scientometrics, 79(3), 541-550.

Quint, B. (2006). Elsevier’s Scopus introduces citation tracker: challenge to Thomson ISI’s Web of Science? Retrieved from http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16004

Raj, R. G., & Zainab, Z. N. (2012). Relative measure index: a metric to measure quality. Scientometrics.

Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587-600.

Actions (login required)

View Item

A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases - E-LIS repository

SSRN Author Page for Salehi, Hadi

June 11, 2013, 5:37 pm

≫ Next: Peer Evaluation : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

≪ Previous: A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases - E-LIS repository

$

0

0

1.		A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases| Show Abstract | Download | Asian Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013 Accepted Paper Series	Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo University Kebangsaan Malaysia Salehi, Hadi Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch Yunus, Melor Md National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education Farhadi, Hadi Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia-Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM) Fooladi, Masood Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch Farhadi, Maryam National University of Malaysia - UKM Ale Ebrahim, Nader University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering	Posted: 29 Apr 13 Last Revised: 09 May 13	36 (234,842)
2.		Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?| Show Abstract | Download | Asian Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 176-182, April 2013. Accepted Paper Series	Fooladi, Masood Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch Salehi, Hadi Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch Yunus, Melor Md National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education Farhadi, Maryam National University of Malaysia - UKM Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo University Kebangsaan Malaysia Farhadi, Hadi Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia-Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM) Ale Ebrahim, Nader University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering	Posted: 28 Apr 13 Last Revised: 09 May 13	33 (239,729)
3.		Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the H-Index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers?| Show Abstract | Download | Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 198-202, March 2013 Accepted Paper Series	Farhadi, Hadi Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia-Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM) Salehi, Hadi Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch Yunus, Melor Md National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo University Kebangsaan Malaysia Farhadi, Maryam National University of Malaysia - UKM Fooladi, Masood Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch Ale Ebrahim, Nader University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering

SSRN Author Page for Salehi, Hadi

---

Peer Evaluation : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

June 11, 2013, 5:39 pm

≫ Next: Zotero | Groups > allsisscholcomm > Library > Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

≪ Previous: SSRN Author Page for Salehi, Hadi

$

0

0

 Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

 0WordPress0CiteULike0 New

• Read
• Review
• Email
• Add to collection
• Download

Description

New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).

Title : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Author(s) : Nader Ale Ebrahim

Abstract : Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Keywords : Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation

Subject : Education
Area : Education
Language : English
Year : 2013

Affiliations :

Research Support Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia

Journal : Asian Social Science
Volume : 9
Issue : 5
Publisher : Canadian Center of Science and Education
Pages : 176-182
Isbn : 1911-2025
Doi : 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176

- See more at: http://peerev.org/read/libraryID:29784?data%5BReview%5D%5Baffiliation_id%5D=0#sthash.y7fcHcqt.dpuf

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

 0WordPress0CiteULike0 New

• Read
• Review
• Email
• Add to collection
• Download

Description

New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).

Title : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Author(s) : Nader Ale Ebrahim

Abstract : Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Keywords : Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation

Subject : Education
Area : Education
Language : English
Year : 2013

Affiliations :

Research Support Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia

Journal : Asian Social Science
Volume : 9
Issue : 5
Publisher : Canadian Center of Science and Education
Pages : 176-182
Isbn : 1911-2025
Doi : 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176

- See more at: http://peerev.org/read/libraryID:29784?data%5BReview%5D%5Baffiliation_id%5D=0#sthash.y7fcHcqt.dpuf

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

 0WordPress0CiteULike0 New

• Read
• Review
• Email
• Add to collection
• Download

Description

New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).

Title : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Author(s) : Nader Ale Ebrahim

Abstract : Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Keywords : Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation

Subject : Education
Area : Education
Language : English
Year : 2013

Affiliations :

Research Support Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia

Journal : Asian Social Science
Volume : 9
Issue : 5
Publisher : Canadian Center of Science and Education
Pages : 176-182
Isbn : 1911-2025
Doi : 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176

Leave a comment

- See more at: http://peerev.org/read/libraryID:29784?data%5BReview%5D%5Baffiliation_id%5D=0#sthash.y7fcHcqt.dpuf

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

 0WordPress0CiteULike0 New

• Read
• Review
• Email
• Add to collection
• Download

Description

New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).

Title : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Author(s) : Nader Ale Ebrahim

Abstract : Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Keywords : Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation

Subject : Education
Area : Education
Language : English
Year : 2013

Affiliations :

Research Support Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia

Journal : Asian Social Science
Volume : 9
Issue : 5
Publisher : Canadian Center of Science and Education
Pages : 176-182
Isbn : 1911-2025
Doi : 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176

- See more at: http://peerev.org/read/libraryID:29784?data%5BReview%5D%5Baffiliation_id%5D=0#sthash.y7fcHcqt.dpuf

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

 0WordPress0CiteULike0 New

• Read
• Review
• Email
• Add to collection
• Download

Description

New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).

Title : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Author(s) : Nader Ale Ebrahim

Abstract : Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers’ behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.

Keywords : Impact factor (IF), Journal ranking, Criticism, Praise, SCOPUS, Web of science, Self-citation

Subject : Education
Area : Education
Language : English
Year : 2013

Affiliations :

Research Support Unit, Centre of Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya, Malaysia

Journal : Asian Social Science
Volume : 9
Issue : 5
Publisher : Canadian Center of Science and Education
Pages : 176-182
Isbn : 1911-2025
Doi : 10.5539/ass.v9n5p176

- See more at: http://peerev.org/read/libraryID:29784?data%5BReview%5D%5Baffiliation_id%5D=0#sthash.y7fcHcqt.dpuf

Peer Evaluation : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

Zotero | Groups > allsisscholcomm > Library > Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

June 11, 2013, 5:40 pm

≫ Next: SSRN TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Product Innovation eJournal

≪ Previous: Peer Evaluation : Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

$

0

0

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

Added by	mpearse
Item Type	Journal Article
Title	Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?
Publication	Asian Social Science
Volume	9
Pages	176
Date	2013
URL	http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2257552
Tags

Notes and Attachments

• science

Zotero | Groups > allsisscholcomm > Library > Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

SSRN TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Product Innovation eJournal

June 11, 2013, 11:57 pm

≫ Next: SSRN Top 0 Papers for Journal of Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

≪ Previous: Zotero | Groups > allsisscholcomm > Library > Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?

$

0

0

ALL TIME HITS (for all papers in SSRN eLibrary)
TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Product Innovation eJournal
January 2, 1997 to June 11, 2013

Rank	Downloads	Paper Title
1	2424	The Curse of the First-Mover: When Incremental Innovation Leads to Radical Change Thierry Rayna, Ludmila Striukova, London Metropolitan Business School, University College London, Date posted to database: May 13, 2009 Last Revised: June 3, 2009
2	1121	Corporate Foresight: Its Three Roles in Enhancing the Innovation Capacity of a Firm Hans Georg Gemünden, René Rohrbeck, University of Aarhus - Business and Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Technical University of Berlin, Date posted to database: May 31, 2010 Last Revised: January 15, 2011
3	880	Open Innovation with Customers: Crowdsourcing and Co-Creation at Threadless Frank T. Piller, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, Date posted to database: October 7, 2010 Last Revised: October 7, 2010
4	859	Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control Geoffrey Parker, Marshall W. Van Alstyne, Tulane University - A.B. Freeman School of Business, Boston University - Department of Management Information Systems, Date posted to database: January 2, 2008 Last Revised: February 5, 2013
5	778	Mass Customization at Adidas: Three Strategic Capabilities to Implement Mass Customization Frank Steiner, Frank T. Piller, Evalotte Lindgens, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, RWTH Aachen University, RWTH Aachen University - School of Business and Economics, Date posted to database: January 31, 2012 Last Revised: January 31, 2012
6	710	Virtual R&D Teams in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Literature Review Nader Ale Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, Zahari Taha, University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya (UM), University of Malaya (UM), Date posted to database: January 5, 2010 Last Revised: February 2, 2010
7	643	A Conceptual Model for Adoption and Diffusion Process of a New Product and an Eagerly Wanted Product Masataka Yamada, Ryuji Furukawa, Hiroshi Kato, Kyoto Sangyo University - Faculty of Business Administration, Unaffiliated Authors - affiliation not provided to SSRN, Iihara Management Institute, Date posted to database: May 5, 2002 Last Revised: June 26, 2012
8	641	Capitalization of R&D Costs and Earnings Management: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies Garen Markarian, Annalisa Prencipe, Lorenzo Pozza, Bocconi University - Department of Accounting, Bocconi University - Department of Accounting, Fundación Instituto de Empresa, S.L. - IE Business School, Date posted to database: October 5, 2007 Last Revised: May 12, 2008
9	653	From Social Media to Social Product Development: The Impact of Social Media on Co-Creation of Innovation Frank T. Piller, Christoph Ihl, Alexander Vossen, RWTH Aachen University, Germany, RWTH Aachen University, RWTH Aachen University, Technology and Innovation Management Group, Date posted to database: December 23, 2011 Last Revised: May 8, 2013
10	685	An Analysis of the Total Quality Movement: In Search of Quality Enhancement through Structural and Strategic Synthesis B. Tim Lowder, Saint Leo University, Date posted to database: September 25, 2007 Last Revised: May 25, 2008

SSRN Top Downloads

SSRN Top 0 Papers for Journal of Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

June 12, 2013, 6:08 pm

≫ Next: SSRN Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

≪ Previous: SSRN TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Product Innovation eJournal

$

0

0

ALL TIME HITS (for all papers in SSRN eLibrary)
TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal
January 2, 1997 to June 12, 2013

Rank	Downloads	Paper Title
1	80	The Evolution of Water Law Through 4,000 Years Joseph W. Dellapenna, Joyeeta Gupta, Villanova University School of Law, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Date posted to database: May 15, 2013 Last Revised: May 28, 2013
2	75	Rethinking Transboundary Ground Water Resources Management: A Local Approach along the Mexico-U.S. Border Gabriel Eckstein, Texas Wesleyan University School of Law, Date posted to database: April 20, 2013 Last Revised: April 20, 2013
3	61	A tutela judicial do direito público à saúde no Brasil (Judicial Protection of the Public Right to Health Care in Brazil) Ricardo Perlingeiro, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Date posted to database: April 14, 2013 Last Revised: April 21, 2013
4	56	Infrastructural Development: The Vision of Nigerian Sovereign Wealth Fund Aniaka Oluchi, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Date posted to database: March 14, 2013 Last Revised: March 14, 2013
5	53	Dare You Sue the Tax Collector! An Empirical Study of Administrative Lawsuits Against Tax Agencies in China Ji Li, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Law School, Date posted to database: April 25, 2013 Last Revised: April 25, 2013
6	49	Impact of Irreversibility and Uncertainty on the Timing of Infrastructure Projects Kojo Menyah, Phuong Doan, University of Cambridge, London Metropolitan University - Department of Accounting, Banking and Financial Systems (ABFS), Date posted to database: March 10, 2013 Last Revised: March 10, 2013
7	43	Public Sector E-Innovations: E-Government and Its Impact on Corruption Hans Pitlik, Liliana Proskuryakova, Gulnara Abdrakhmanova, National Research University Higher School of Economics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO), Date posted to database: January 26, 2013 Last Revised: May 25, 2013
8	42	Models of Public Service Reform: A Problem-Solving Approach Willy McCourt, World Bank, Date posted to database: May 1, 2013 Last Revised: May 2, 2013
9	39	Impact of Private Health Insurance on Lengths of Hospitalization and Healthcare Expenditure in India: Evidences from a Quasi-Experiment Study Sukumar Vellakkal, Public Health foundation of India (PHFI), Date posted to database: April 11, 2013 Last Revised: April 11, 2013
10	37	A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases Nader Ale Ebrahim, Hadi Farhadi, Maryam Farhadi, Hadi Salehi, Melor Md Yunus, Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Masood Fooladi, Islamic Azad University, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia-Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM), Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch, National University of Malaysia - UKM, University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, Date posted to database: April 29, 2013 Last Revised: May 9, 2013

SSRN Top Downloads

SSRN Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

June 12, 2013, 6:08 pm

≫ Next: SSRN RECENT TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

≪ Previous: SSRN Top 0 Papers for Journal of Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal

$

0

0

Does it Matter Which Citation Tool is Used to Compare the H-Index of a Group of Highly Cited Researchers?
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 198-202, March 2013
Hadi Farhadi , Hadi Salehi , Melor Md Yunus , Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani , Maryam Farhadi , Masood Fooladi and Nader Ale Ebrahim
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia-Research Center for Islamic Economics and Finance (EKONIS-UKM) , Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch , National University of Malaysia - Faculty of Education , Islamic Azad University , National University of Malaysia - UKM , Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch and University of Malaya - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering
Date Posted: June 06, 2013
Accepted Paper Series
17 downloads
SSRN Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal