Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency

PDF MPRA_paper_50919.pdf Download (301Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Due to the effect of citation impact on The Higher Education (THE) world university ranking system, most of the researchers are looking for some helpful techniques to increase their citation record. This paper by reviewing the relevant articles extracts 33 different ways for increasing the citations possibilities. The results show that the article visibility has tended to receive more download and citations. This is probably the first study to collect over 30 different ways to improve the citation record. Further study is needed to explore and expand these techniques in specific fields of study in order to make the results more precisely.

Item Type:	MPRA Paper
Original Title:	Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency
Language:	English
Keywords:	University ranking, Improve citation, Citation frequency, Research impact, Open access, h-index
Subjects:	A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economics Education and Teaching of Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economics Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M3 - Marketing and Advertising Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General
Item ID:	50919
Depositing User:	Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	13. Nov 2013 05:29
Last Modified:	13. Nov 2013 05:32
References:	Abt, H. A. (1998). Why some papers have long citation lifetimes. [10.1038/27355]. Nature 395(6704), 756-757, doi:10.1038/27355. ACM (2013). ACM Computing Surveys. http://csur.acm.org/author_info.html. Accessed 30 May 2013. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., et al. (2013). A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26, doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 12(3), 159-170, doi:10.3152/147154403781776645. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2012). Publication Marketing Tools “Enhancing Research Visibility and Improving Citations”. Research Tools in Education Series, 1(2), 1-86 Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review. [Review]. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(13), 1575–1590. Ball, P. (2008). A longer paper gathers more citations. Nature 455(7211), 274-275, doi:10.1038/455274a. Are scientific reputations boosted artificially? (2011, 6 May). Nature Ball, P. (2012, 11 October). Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts. Nature Calcagno, V., Demoinet, E., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D., & de Mazancourt, C. (2012). Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns. Science 338(6110), 1065-1069, doi:10.1126/science.1227833. Corbyn, Z. (2010). An easy way to boost a paper's citations. Nature doi:10.1038/news.2010.406 Cotropia, C. A., & Petherbridge, L. (2013). The Dominance of Teams in the Production of Legal Knowledge. Loyola-LA Legal Studies. Dhawan, S., & Gupta, B. (2005). Evaluation of Indian physics research on journal impact factor and citations count: A comparative study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 25(3), 3-7. Emerald Guide (2012). How to... write an abstract. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1. Accessed 09 May 2013. Evans, J. A. (2008). Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Science 321(5887), 395-399, doi:10.1126/science.1150473. Fooladi, M., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Farhadi, H., et al. (2013). Do Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor? Asian Social Science, 9(5), 176-182, doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p176. Frost, R. (2009). Case study: Open Access visibility and impact of an individual researcher. http://www.openscholarship.org/jcms/c_6220/case-study-open-access-visibility-and-impact-of-an-individual-researcher. Accessed 9 May 2013. Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Perspective on Citation Analysis of Scientists. In Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8): Wiley New York. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636. Hamrick, T. A., Fricker, R. D., & Brown, G. G. (2010). Assessing What Distinguishes Highly Cited from Less-Cited Papers Published in Interfaces. Interfaces 40(6), 454-464, doi:10.1287/inte.1100.0527. Harnad, S. (2006). Publish or perish—self-archive to flourish: the green route to open access. ERCIM News, 64. Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics 88(2), 653-661, doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z. Jones, K., & Evans, K. (2013). Good Practices for Improving Citations to your Published Work. (pp. 2). University of BATH. Krause, K. (2009). Increasing your Article's Citation Rates. Open Access Week., Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. [10.1038/35079151]. Nature 411(6837), 521-521. LiU E-Press (2007). One way to increase citation frequency. http://www.ep.liu.se/authorinf/postpubl.en.asp. Accessed 9 May 2013. MacCallum, C. J., & Parthasarathy, H. (2006). Open Access Increases Citation Rate. PLoS Biol, 4(5), e176, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040176. Marashi, S.-A., Seyed Mohammad Amin, H.-N., Alishah, K., Hadi, M., Karimi, A., Hosseinian, S., et al. (2013). Impact of Wikipedia on citation trends. EXCLI Journal, 12, 15-19, doi:citeulike-article-id:12202824. McCabe, M. J. (2011). Online Access and the Scientific Journal Market: An Economist’s Perspective. (Vol. Draft Report for the National Academy of Sciences, pp. 1-36): University of Michigan and SKEMA Business School. Ortega, L., & Antell, K. (2006). Tracking Cross-Disciplinary Information Use by Author Affiliation: Demonstration of a Method. College & Research Libraries 67(5), 446-462. Pislyakov, V., & Shukshina, E. (2012). Measuring Excellence in Russia: Highly Cited Papers, Leading Institutions, Patterns of National and International Collaboration. Paper presented at the Proceedings of STI 2012, Montréal, Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e308, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308. SAGE (2012). 10 Ways to Increase Usage and Citation of your Published Article Using Social Media. http://www.sagepub.com/authors/journal/10ways.sp. Accessed 9 May 2013. Sahu, D. (2005). Open Access: Why India Should Brace it? In (pp. 1-49). Sarli, C., & Holmes, K. (2011). Strategies for Enhancing the Impact of Research. https://becker.wustl.edu/impact-assessment/strategies. Accessed 9 May 2013. Smith, A. G. (2005). Citations and Links as a Measure of Effectiveness of Online LIS Journals. IFLA Journal, 31(1), 76-84, doi:10.1177/0340035205052651. Swan, A. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Taylor & Francis Group (2012a). Optimize citations. http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/beyondpublication/optimizingcitations.asp. Accessed 9 May 2013. Taylor & Francis Group (2012b). Promote your article. http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/beyondpublication/promotearticle.asp. Accessed 9 May 2013. Vanclay, J. K. (2013). Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 265-271, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.009. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313-1322, doi:10.1002/asi.10338. Wong, R. (2008). Ways to Maximise Citations for Researchers. (pp. 1-7). University of Sheffield. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316(5827), 1036-1039, doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
URI:	http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50919

Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency - Munich Personal RePEc Archive