Effective virtual teams for new product development

PDF MPRA_paper_39510.pdf Download (1312Kb) | Preview

Abstract

At present, the existing literature shows that the factors which influence the effectiveness of virtual teams for new product development are still ambiguous. To address this problem, a research design was developed, which includes detailed literature review, preliminary model and field survey. From literature review, the factors which influence the effectiveness of virtual teams are identified and these factors are modified using a field survey. The relationship between knowledge workers (people), process and technology in virtual teams is explored in this study. The results of the study suggest that technology and process are tightly correlated and need to be considered early in virtual teams. The use of software as a service, web solution, report generator and tracking system should be incorporated for effectiveness virtual teams.

Item Type:	MPRA Paper
Original Title:	Effective virtual teams for new product development
Language:	English
Keywords:	Virtual teams, collaboration, questionnaires, communication, information, integration, performance, success, cross-functional teams, product development
Subjects:	L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P42 - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices; Population P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P23 - Factor and Product Markets; Industry Studies; Population O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Item ID:	39510
Depositing User:	Nader Ale Ebrahim
Date Deposited:	18. Jun 2012 02:47
Last Modified:	12. Feb 2013 05:45
References:	Akgün AE, Dayan M,Benedetto AD (2008). New product development team intelligence: Antecedents and consequences Inform. Manage., 45(4): 221-226. Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2009a). Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process. Afr. J. Mark. Manage., 1(9): 211-219. Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2009b). Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review. Sci. Res. Essays, 4(13): 1575–1590. Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2009c). Virtual Teams for New Product Development – An Innovative Experience for R&D Engineers. Eur. J. Educ. Stud., 1(3): 109-123. Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2009d). Virtual Teams: a Literature Review. Aust. j. basic appl. sci., 3(3): 2653-2669. Ale Ebrahim N, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2010). Critical Factors for New Product Developments in SMEs Virtual Team. Afr. J. Bus. Manage., 4(11): 2247-2257. Anderson AH, Mcewan R, Bal J,Carletta J (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Comput. Hum. Behav., 23(2558–2580. Badrinarayanan V,Arnett DB (2008). Effective virtual new product development teams: an integrated framework. J Bus Ind Mark, 23(4): 242-248. Bal J,Gundry J (1999). Virtual teaming in the automotive supply chain. Team Perform. Manage., 5(6): 174 - 193. Bal J,Teo PK (2001a). Implementing virtual teamworking: Part 2 - a literature review. Logist. Infor. Manage., 14(3): 208 - 222. Bal J,Teo PK (2001b). Implementing virtual teamworking: Part 3 – a methodology for introducing virtual teamworking. Logist. Infor. Manage., 14(4): 276 - 292. Bell BS,Kozlowski SWJ (2002). A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership. Group Organ. Manage., 27(1): 14-49. Bouchard L,Cassivi L (2004). Assessment of a Web-groupware technology for virtual teams. IAMOT 2004. Washington, D.C. Chudoba KM, Wynn E, Lu M, Watson-Manheim,Beth M (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Inform. Syst. J., 15(4): 279-306. Cronbach L (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika., 16(3): 297-334. Cummings JL,Teng BS (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. J. Eng. Tech. Manage., 20(1): 39–68. Dekker DM, Rutte CG,Van Den Berg PT (2008). Cultural differences in the perception of critical interaction behaviors in global virtual teams. Int. J. Intercult. Rel., 32(5): 441-452. Denscombe M (2006). Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 24(2): 246-254. Deutskens E, De Ruyter K,Wetzels M (2006). An assessment of equivalence between online and mail surveys in service research. J. Serv. Res., 8(4): 346-355. Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S,Taha Z (2010). Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs. Afr. J. Bus. Manage., 4(11): 2368-2379. Fathian M, Akhavan P,Hoorali M (2008). E-readiness assessment of non-profit ICT SMEs in a developing country: The case of Iran. Technovation., 28(9): 578-590. Fuller MA, Hardin AM,Davison RM (2006). Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Team J. Manage. Inform. Syst., 23(3): 209-235. Furst SA, Reeves M, Rosen B,Blackburn RS (2004). Managing the life cycle of virtual teams. Acad. Manage. Exec., 18(2): 6-20. González FJM,Palacios TMB (2002). The effect of new product development techniques on new product success in Spanish firms. Ind. Market. Manag., 31(3): 261-271. Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S,John OP (2004). Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. Am. Psychol., 59(2): 93-104. Hertel GT, Geister S,Konradt U (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Hum. Resour. Manage. R., 15(69–95. Huang X, Soutar GN,Brown A (2004). Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Ind. Market. Manag., 33(117– 123. Hunsaker PL,Hunsaker JS (2008). Virtual teams: a leader's guide. Team Perform. Manage., 14(1/2): 86-101. Jacobsa J, Moll JV, Krause P, Kusters R, Trienekens J,Brombacher A (2005). Exploring defect causes in products developed by virtual teams Inform. Software. Tech., 47(6): 399-410. Jarvenpaa SL,Leidner DE (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organ. Sci., 10(6): 791 - 815 Johansen K. (2005). Collaborative Product Introduction within Extended Enterprises. PhD, Linköpings Universitet. Kayworth TR,Leidner DE (2002). Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams Manage. Inf. Syst., 18(3): 7 - 40 Kirkman BL, Rosen B, Gibson CB, Tesluk PE,Mcpherson SO (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: lessons from Sabre Inc. Acad. Manage. Exec., 16(3): 67-79. See the full list of references in the article
URI:	http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39510

Effective virtual teams for new product development - Munich Personal RePEc Archive