Source: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/ref/10.1142/S0219686717500032
Supply Chain
Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific
Faheem Gul Gilal et al,
J. Adv. Manuf. Syst.
16, 35 (2017).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500032
J. Adv. Manuf. Syst.
16, 35 (2017).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500032
Supply Chain
Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation
Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and
Research and Development
References:
- 1. G. W. Fuller , New Food Product Development: From Concept to Marketplace (CRC Press, 2016).
- 2. B. J. Zirger and M. A. Maidique , A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science36 (7) (1990) 867–883. [CrossRef][ISI]
3. I. I. Perry and F. John, The impact of supply chain business
processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance, No.
AFIT/LSCM/ENS/12-14, Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH
School Of Engineering And Management (2012).- 4. N. A. Ebrahim , Virtual R&D teams: A new model for product development, International Journal of Innovation3 (2) (2015) 1. [CrossRef][ISI]
5. S. Li, B. Ragu-Nathan, T. S. Ragu-Nathan and S. S. Rao , The
impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and
organizational performance, Omega34 (2) (2006) 107–124. [CrossRef][ISI]
6. S. C. Lenny Koh, M. Demirbag, E. Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu and S.
Zaim , The impact of supply chain management practices on performance
of SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems107 (1) (2007) 103–124. [CrossRef][ISI]- 7. T. Schoenherr and M. Swink , The roles of supply chain intelligence and adaptability in new product launch success, Decision Sciences46 (5) (2015) 901–936. [CrossRef][ISI]
8. M. Morita, J. A. Machuca, E. J. Flynn and J. L. P. de los Ríos
, Aligning product characteristics and the supply chain process — A
normative perspective, International Journal of Production Economics161 (2015) 228–241. [CrossRef][ISI]- 9. E. Mazzola, M. Bruccoleri and G. Perrone , Supply chain of innovation and new product development, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management21 (4) (2015) 273–284. [CrossRef][ISI]
10. R. Aydin, C. K. Kwong and P. Ji , Coordination of the
closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of
remanufactured products, Journal of Cleaner Production114 (2016) 286–298. [CrossRef][ISI]
11. G. L. Ragatz, R. B. Handfield and K. J. Petersen , Benefits
associated with supplier integration into new product development under
conditions of technology uncertainty, Journal of Business Research55 (5) (2002) 389–400. [CrossRef][ISI]- 12. A. Walter , Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development, Journal of Business Research56 (9) (2003) 721–733. [CrossRef][ISI]
13. D. Luzzini, M. Amann, F. Caniato, M. Essig and S. Ronchi ,
The path of innovation: Purchasing and supplier involvement into new
product development, Industrial Marketing Management47 (2015) 109–120. [CrossRef][ISI]
14. K. D. Wowak, C. W. Craighead, D. J. Ketchen and G. T. M. Hult ,
Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front
end of the new product development process, Journal of Supply Chain Management52 (1) (2016) 66–81. [CrossRef][ISI]- 15. K. Brockhoff , Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development, International Journal of Technology Management26 (5–6) (2003) 464–481. [CrossRef][ISI]
16. M. Sigala , Social networks and customer involvement in new
service development (NSD) The case of www. mystarbucksidea.Com, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management24 (7) (2012) 966–990. [CrossRef][ISI]- 17. R. Filieri , Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry, Marketing Intelligence and Planning31 (1) (2013) 40–53. [CrossRef]
18. A. S. Cui and F. Wu , The impact of customer involvement on new
product development: Contingent and substitutive effects, Journal of Product Innovation Management34 (1) (2016) 60–80. [CrossRef][ISI]
19. B. Menguc, S. Auh and P. Yannopoulos , Customer and supplier
involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical
innovation capability, Journal of Product Innovation Management31 (2) (2014) 313–328. [CrossRef][ISI]- 20. S. Min and J. T. Mentzer , Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts, Journal of Business Logistics25 (1) (2004) 63–99. [CrossRef]
21. S. T. Cavusgil and E. Cavusgil , Reflections on international
marketing: Destructive regeneration and multinational firms, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40 (2) (2012) 202–217. [CrossRef][ISI]
22. S. Perçin and H. Min , A hybrid quality function deployment and
fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of
third-party logistics service providers, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications16 (5) (2013) 380–397. [CrossRef]
23. W. Yu, M. A. Jacobs, W. D. Salisbury and H. Enns , The
effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and
financial performance: An organizational learning perspective, International Journal of Production Economics146 (1) (2013) 346–358. [CrossRef][ISI]
24. T. A. Chin and H. H. Tat , Does gender diversity moderate the
relationship between supply chain management practice and performance in
the electronic manufacturing services industry? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications18 (1) (2015) 35–45. [CrossRef]
25. A. Paulraj, I. J. Chen and C. Blome , Motives and performance
outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A
multi-theoretical perspective, Journal of Business Ethics (2015) 1–20, doi:
[10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0]
.- 26. D. A. Marshall , Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium, International Journal of Supply Chain Management4 (4) (2015) 10–21.
27. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Supply chain management
practices–IT utilisation alignment: Impact on supply chain performance
and firm performance, International Journal of Business Information Systems18 (4) (2015) 364–389. [CrossRef]- 28. S. C. Graves and T. Schoenmeyr , Strategic safety-stock placement in supply chains with capacity constraints, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management18 (3) (2016) 445–460. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 29. F. Firouzi, M. Y. Jaber and E. Baglieri , Trust in supply forecast information sharing, International Journal of Production Research54 (5) (2016) 1322–1333. [CrossRef][ISI]
30. Y. Shi, A. Zhang, T. Arthanari and Y. Liu , Third-party
purchase: An empirical study of Chinese third-party logistics users, International Journal of Operations and Production Management36 (3) (2016) 286–307. [CrossRef][ISI]
31. M. M. Wilhelm, C. Blome, V. Bhakoo and A. Paulraj ,
Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double
agency role of the first-tier supplier, Journal of Operations Management41 (2016) 42–60. [CrossRef][ISI]
32. E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, I. Golgeci, S. L. Koh, M. Demirbag
and S. Zaim , How do supply chain management and information systems
practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging
country SMEs, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications19 (3) (2016) 181–199. [CrossRef]- 33. S. Emmett and B. Crocker , The Relationship-Driven Supply Chain: Creating a Culture of Collaboration Throughout the Chain (CRC Press, 2016).
34. H. Moradlou and C. J. Backhouse , A review of manufacturing
re-shoring in the context of customer-focused postponement strategies, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture (2016), doi:
[10.1177/0954405415623486]
.- 35. S. Brockhaus, S.
Fawcett, W. Kersten and M. Knemeyer , A framework for benchmarking
product sustainability efforts: Using systems dynamics to achieve supply
chain alignment, Benchmarking: An International Journal23 (1) (2016) 127–164. [CrossRef]
36. K. R. Lou and L. Wang , Nash and integrated solutions in a
just-in-time seller–buyer supply chain with buyer’s ordering cost
reductions, International Journal of Systems Science47 (7) (2016) 1615–1623. [CrossRef][ISI]- 37. M. Eskandarian, G. Marthandan, C. A. Malarvizhi and S. Z. Tehrani , Quality in e-procurement success, International Journal of Management and Information Systems20 (3) (2016) 73.
38. B. K. Brockman and R. M. Morgan , The moderating effect of
organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product
development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34 (3) (2006) 295–307. [CrossRef][ISI]
39. J. Mu and C. A. Di Benedetto , Strategic orientations and new
product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay, R&D Management41 (4) (2011) 337–359. [CrossRef][ISI]
40. B. D. Williams, J. Roh, T. Tokar and M. Swink , Leveraging
supply chain visibility for responsiveness: The moderating role of
internal integration, Journal of Operations Management31 (7) (2013) 543–554. [CrossRef][ISI]
41. M. Kim, N. C. Suresh and C. Kocabasoglu-Hillmer , An impact of
manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing
strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: Business environment
perspective, International Journal of Production Research51 (18) (2013) 5597–5611. [CrossRef][ISI]- 42. S. H. Hum and M. Parlar , Measurement and optimization of supply chain responsiveness, IIE Transactions46 (1) (2014) 1–22. [CrossRef][ISI]
43. M. Jahre and N. Fabbe-Costes , How standards and modularity can
improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness: The case of emergency
response units, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management5 (3) (2015) 348–386. [CrossRef]
44. E. Sandberg , Restructuring the supply chain to meet customer
demands — The supply chain responsiveness of a Swedish wholesaler, The 20th Annual International Symposium on Logistics (ISL), Bologna, Italy (2015), pp. 36–37.
45. J. Moyano-Fuentes, M. Sacristán-Díaz and P. Garrido-Vega ,
Improving supply chain responsiveness through Advanced Manufacturing
Technology: The mediating role of internal and external integration, Production Planning and Control27 (2016) 686–697. [CrossRef][ISI]
46. A. A. Thatte, S. S. Rao and T. S. Ragu-Nathan , Impact of SCM
practices of a firm on supply chain responsiveness and competitive
advantage of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research29 (2) (2013) 499–530. [CrossRef]
47. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Lean and agile supply chain
strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic
supplier partnership and postponement, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal18 (6) (2013) 571–582. [CrossRef][ISI]- 48. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt , Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions, Academy of Management Review20 (2) (1995) 343–378. [ISI]
49. T. Morgan, S. Anokhin, A. Kretinin and J. Frishammar , The
dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation
interplay: A new product development perspective, International Small Business Journal33 (7) (2015) 731–751. [CrossRef][ISI]
50. A. De Massis, J. Kotlar, F. Frattini, J. J. Chrisman and M.
Nordqvist , Family governance at work organizing for new product
development in family SMEs, Family Business Review (2016), doi:
[10.1177/0894486515622722]
. [CrossRef][ISI]
51. R. B. Handfield and C. Bechtel , The role of trust and
relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness, Industrial Marketing Management31 (4) (2002) 367–382. [CrossRef][ISI]
52. P. Danese, P. Romano and M. Formentini , The impact of supply
chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an
international supplier network, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review49 (1) (2013) 125–140. [CrossRef][ISI]
53. E. Cantor, D. , J. Blackhurst, M. Pan and M. Crum ,
Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on
supply chain risk and demand responsiveness, The International Journal of Logistics Management25 (1) (2014) 202–223. [CrossRef][ISI]
54. Z. Cai, Q. Huang, H. Liu and L. Liang , The moderating role
of information technology capability in the relationship between supply
chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness: Evidence from
China, International Journal of Operations and Production Management36 (10) (2016) 1247–1271. [CrossRef][ISI]
55. Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis , Relationships between operational
practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain
management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management22 (3) (2004) 265–289. [CrossRef][ISI]
56. A. Oke, D. I. Prajogo and J. Jayaram , Strengthening the
innovation chain: The role of internal innovation climate and strategic
relationships with supply chain partners, Journal of Supply Chain Management49 (4) (2013) 43–58. [CrossRef][ISI]- 57. Z. Liu, D. Prajogo and A. Oke , Supply chain technologies: Linking adoption, utilization, and performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management52 (4) (2016) 22–41. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 58. D. S. Pugh, D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner , Dimensions of organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly1 (1968) 65–105. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 59. J. Child , Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly1 (1973) 168–185. [CrossRef][ISI]
60. L. A. Gordon and V. K. Narayanan , Management accounting
systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure:
An empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society9 (1) (1984) 33–47. [CrossRef][ISI]
61. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin , The influence of organization
structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style, Journal of Management Studies25 (3) (1988) 217–234. [CrossRef][ISI]
62. R. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, R.
Gilbert and Z. Griliches, Appropriating the returns from industrial
research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1987(3) (1987) 783–831.- 63. N. R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Wooldridge , A roadmap of agent research and development, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems1 (1) (1998) 7–38. [CrossRef]
64. T. Elkins and R. T. Keller , Leadership in research and
development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework,
The Leadership Quarterly14 (4) (2003) 587–606. [CrossRef][ISI]
65. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny , The moderator–mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and
statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6) (1986) 1173. [CrossRef][ISI]- 66. D. Muller, C. M. Judd and V. Y. Yzerbyt , When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89 (6) (2005) 852. [CrossRef][ISI]
67. J. R. Edwards and L. S. Lambert , Methods for integrating
moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated
path analysis, Psychological Methods12 (1) (2007) 1. [CrossRef][ISI]
68. K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker and A. F. Hayes , Addressing
moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions, Multivariate Behavioral Research42 (1) (2007) 185–227. [CrossRef][ISI]
69. F. G. Gilal, R. G. Gilal, J. Zhang, R. G. Gilal and N. G.
Gilal , Supply Chain management practices as a contemporary source of
securing competitive advantage and organizational performance: Evidence
from the FMCGs of Pakistan, International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management8 (3), in press.- 70. A. Ghosh, S. Das and A. Deshpande , Effect of responsiveness and process integration in supply chain coordination, IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management11 (1) (2014) 7.
- 71. G. Seebacher and H. Winkler , A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics167 (2015) 177–186. [CrossRef][ISI]
72. K. Fantazy and M. Salem , The value of strategy and flexibility
in new product development: The impact on performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management29 (4) (2016) 525–548. [CrossRef][ISI]
73. S. Tyagi, A. Choudhary, X. Cai and K. Yang , Value stream
mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process, International Journal of Production Economics160 (2015) 202–212. [CrossRef][ISI]- 74. R. G. Cooper , Predevelopment activities determine new product success, Industrial Marketing Management17 (3) (1988) 237–247. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 75. W. Chang and S. A. Taylor , The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing80 (1) (2016) 47–64. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 76. K. Talke and E. J. Hultink , Managing diffusion barriers when launching new products, Journal of Product Innovation Management27 (4) (2010) 537–553. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 77. S. H. Kim and S. Netessine , Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry, Management Science59 (1) (2013) 189–206. [CrossRef][ISI]
78. R. Eltantawy, A. Paulraj, L. Giunipero, D. Naslund and A. A.
Thute , Towards supply chain coordination and productivity in a three
echelon supply chain: Action research study, International Journal of Operations and Production Management35 (6) (2015) 895–924. [CrossRef][ISI]- 79. S. B. Aissa and M. Goaied , Determinants of Tunisian hotel profitability: The role of managerial efficiency, Tourism Management52 (2016) 478–487. [CrossRef][ISI]
80. E. Bayraktar, M. Demirbag, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu and H. Zaim ,
A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply
chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from
manufacturing SMEs in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics122 (1) (2009) 133–149. [CrossRef][ISI]
81. E. Bayraktar, A. Gunasekaran, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu, M.
Demirbag and S. Zaim , An efficiency comparison of supply chain
management and information systems practices: A study of Turkish and
Bulgarian small-and medium-sized enterprises in food products and
beverages, International Journal of Production Research48 (2) (2010) 425–451. [CrossRef][ISI]
82. S. M. Ebrahimi, Examining the impact of supply chain integration
on organization structure and operational performance in oil and gas
supply chains: A contingency approach, Doctoral dissertation, University
of Sheffield (2015).- 83. J. D. Thompson , Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, 1967).
84. D. R. Dalton, W. D. Todor, M. J. Spendolini, G. J. Fielding
and L. W. Porter , Organization structure and performance: A critical
review, Academy of Management Review5 (1) (1980) 49–64.
85. N. Erhardt, C. Martin-Rios and J. Harkins , Knowledge flow
from the top: The importance of teamwork structure in team sports, European Sport Management Quarterly14 (4) (2014) 375–396. [CrossRef][ISI]
86. R. Germain, C. Claycomb and C. Dröge , Supply chain
variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating
effect of demand unpredictability, Journal of Operations Management26 (5) (2008) 557–570. [CrossRef][ISI]
87. Q. Yinan, M. Tang and M. Zhang , Mass customization in flat
organization: The mediating role of supply chain planning and
corporation coordination, Journal of Applied Research and Technology12 (2) (2014) 171–181. [CrossRef]
88. X. A. Koufteros and M. A. Vonderembse , The impact of
organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory
development, International Journal of Production Research36 (10) (1998) 2863–2878. [CrossRef][ISI]
89. A. Y. Nahm, M. A. Vonderembse and X. A. Koufteros , The impact
of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant
performance, Journal of Operations Management21 (3) (2003) 281–306. [CrossRef][ISI]- 90. F. C. Lunenburg , Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework, International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity14 (1) (2012) 1–8.
91. D. Baumann-Pauly, C. Wickert, L. J. Spence and A. G. Scherer ,
Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms:
Size matters, Journal of Business Ethics115 (4) (2013) 693–705. [CrossRef][ISI]- 92. R. W. Griffin , Fundamentals of Management (Cengage Learning, 2013).
- 93. A. M. Townsend, S. M. DeMarie and A. R. Hendrickson , Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, The Academy of Management Executive12 (3) (1998) 17–29.
- 94. P. K. Humphreys, M. K. Lai and D. Sculli , An inter-organizational information system for supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics70 (3) (2001) 245–255. [CrossRef][ISI]
95. A. Paulraj, A. A. Lado and I. J. Chen , Inter-organizational
communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance
outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management26 (1) (2008) 45–64. [CrossRef][ISI]
96. S. Gold, S. Seuring and P. Beske , Sustainable supply chain
management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management17 (4) (2010) 230–245. [ISI]
97. R. Rajaguru and M. J. Matanda , Effects of inter-organizational
compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating
role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration, Industrial Marketing Management42 (4) (2013) 620–632. [CrossRef][ISI]
98. J. M. Denolf, J. H. Trienekens, P. N. Wognum, J. G. van der
Vorst and S. O. Omta , Towards a framework of critical success factors
for implementing supply chain information systems, Computers in Industry68 (2015) 16–26. [CrossRef][ISI]
99. X. Zhang, D. P. Van Donk and T. van der Vaart , The different
impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on suppy
chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management36 (7) (2016) 803–824. [CrossRef][ISI]- 100. P. Arlow and M. J. Gannon , Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance, Academy of Management Review7 (2) (1982) 235–241.
101. M. Perez-Valls, J. Cespedes-Lorente and J. Moreno-Garcia ,
Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic
flexibility and performance, Business Strategy and the Environment (2015), doi:
[10.1002/bse.1881]
.- 102. J. Y. Lee, I. V.
Kozlenkova and R. W. Palmatier , Structural marketing: Using
organizational structure to achieve marketing objectives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43 (1) (2015) 73–99. [CrossRef][ISI] - 103. E. A. Hoşgör , Organizational structure, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management6 (2015) 1–6. [CrossRef]
104. J. Joseph, R. Klingebiel and A. J. Wilson , Organizational
structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and
termination decisions, Organization Science27 (5) (2016) 1065–1083. [CrossRef][ISI]- 105. I. Garbie , Management for sustainability, in Sustainability in Manufacturing Enterprise (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 81–89. [CrossRef]
106. M. Holweg, S. Disney, J. Holmström and J. Småros , Supply
chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum, European Management Journal23 (2) (2005) 170–181. [CrossRef]- 107. R. R. Lummus, L. K. Duclos and R. J. Vokurka , Supply chain flexibility: Building a new model, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management4 (4) (2003) 1–13.
108. C. Liu, B. Huo, S. Liu and X. Zhao , Effect of information
sharing and process coordination on logistics outsourcing, Industrial Management and Data Systems115 (1) (2015) 41–63. [CrossRef][ISI]
109. J. G. van der Vorst, R. Ossevoort, M. de Keizer, T. van
Woensel, C. N. Verdouw, E. Wenink and R. van Willegen , DAVINC3I:
Towards collaborative responsive logistics networks in floriculture, in
Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 37–53. [CrossRef]
110. M. M. P. Marchesini and R. L. C. Alcântara , Logistics
activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to
guide their implementation, The International Journal of Logistics Management27 (1) (2016) 6–30. [CrossRef][ISI]
111. T. Yan, T. Y. Choi, Y. Kim and Y. Yang , A theory of the
nexus supplier: A critical supplier from a network perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management51 (1) (2015) 52–66. [CrossRef][ISI]
112. P. Y. Chu, K. H. Chang and H. F. Huang , How to increase
supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies?
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing27 (2) (2012) 115–131. [CrossRef][ISI]- 113. L. E. Gadde, H. Håkansson and G. Persson , Supply Network Strategies (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).
114. A. A. Thatte, V. Agrawal and S. Muhammed , Linking
information sharing and supplier network responsiveness with delivery
dependability of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research25 (3) (2011) 37–56.
115. Y. Kuo, T. Yang, D. Parker and C. H. Sung , Integration of
customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry, Industrial Management and Data Systems116 (2) (2016) 213–235. [CrossRef][ISI]
116. F. M. Armbrecht Jr , Industrial research institute’s 3rd annual
R&D leader board: R&D Spending by the Top 100 US technology
investors in 2000, Research-Technology Management45 (1) (2002) 21.
117. D. M. Kim and G. D. Lee , Introduction to the technology,
applications, products, markets, R&D, and perspectives of nanofoods
in the food industry, Nanotechnology25 (2006) 32–38.
118. M. Song and R. J. Thieme , A cross-national investigation of
the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process, Industrial Marketing Management35 (3) (2006) 308–322. [CrossRef][ISI]- 119. M. A. Schilling and C. W. Hill , Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives, The Academy of Management Executive12 (3) (1998) 67–81.
- 120. L. Aarikka-Stenroos and B. Sandberg , From new-product development to commercialization through networks, Journal of Business Research65 (2) (2012) 198–206. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 121. A. Griffin and J. R. Hauser , The voice of the customer, Marketing Science12 (1) (1993) 1–27. [CrossRef][ISI]
- 122. N. Fain, N. Moes and J. Duhovnik , The role of the user and the society in new product development, Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering56 (7–8) (2010) 513–522. [ISI]
123. W. M. Vagias, Likert-type scale response anchors, Clemson
International Institute for Tourism & Research Development,
Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson
University (2006).- 124. J. F. Perry, The
impact of supply chain management business processes on competitive
advantage and organizational performance, Doctoral dissertation, Air
Force Institute of Technology (2012). - 125. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black , Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall International, NY, 1998).
126. B. M. Byrne , Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and
LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a
measuring instrument, International Journal of Testing1 (1) (2001) 55–86. [CrossRef]- 127. K. G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom , LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (SPSS, 1989).
128. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing , Structural equation
modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin103 (3) (1988) 411. [CrossRef][ISI]- 129. L. A. Aroian , The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics18 (2) (1947) 265–271. [CrossRef]
130. X. Huang, M. M. Kristal and R. G. Schroeder , The impact of
organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency
view, Production and Operations Management19 (5) (2010) 515–530. [CrossRef][ISI]
131. N. J. Foss, J. Lyngsie and S. A. Zahra , Organizational
design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and
formalization for opportunity discovery and realization, Strategic Organization (2014), doi:
[10.1177/1476127014561944]
. [ISI]
132. M. G. Jacobides , The inherent limits of organizational
structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a
near-war, Organization Science18 (3) (2007) 455–477. [CrossRef][ISI]- 133. J. R. Galbraith , Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, 1973).
134. A. K. Gupta, S. P. Raj and D. Wilemon , A model for studying
R&D. Marketing interface in the product innovation process, The Journal of Marketing50 (2) (1986) 7–17. [CrossRef][ISI]
Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development | Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , Vol 16, No 01 | World Scientific